Recruiting for a playtest is not recruiting for a job

Back

“Tell us why you would make an excellent playtester.”

It sounds like a reasonable application question. But what does the answer help you decide?

Unless you’re recruiting for a role, players don’t need to sell themselves to your studio. They need relevant gaming experience, the availability to take part and the ability to contribute to the research you’re planning.

Those are the things the application should explore.

Ask about experience, not a sales pitch

A polished answer about being passionate, hardworking and a team player tells you little about someone’s suitability for a particular study.

Ask about the games they play, how they play them and the experiences that matter to the brief.

Where a discussion is involved, explore whether they can describe those experiences in their own words. Where gameplay is central, assess the relevant familiarity or skill.

The requirements should follow the research method.

Players don’t need to diagnose your design

Someone might explain that they couldn’t find their next objective, stopped trusting a teammate or abandoned a task because it felt repetitive.

That can give the researcher something useful to explore. The player doesn’t also need to identify the underlying design problem or propose a solution.

Unless specialist expertise is part of the brief, knowledge of development terminology shouldn’t become an unofficial entry requirement.

Make the invitation match the opportunity

Application language sets expectations.

Asking for a gaming CV, a persuasive personal statement or evidence of “testing talent” can make a research opportunity sound like a route into employment.

Explain what participation actually involves: playing, completing tasks, answering questions or discussing experiences. Be clear about the commitment, incentive and selection process.

Players should understand that honest feedback is welcome, including uncertainty, frustration and criticism. They don’t need to impress the studio.

Select for the contribution you need

Some studies genuinely require expert players, technical knowledge or detailed analysis. Define those requirements when they matter.

For other studies, an everyday player’s experience may be exactly what you need to understand.

At Gromotion, screening and validation focus on the experience required by the brief. A convincing application should never substitute for evidence of suitability.

Planning a playtest? Talk to Gromotion about the players you need and what they’ll actually be asked to do.